Date:  March 12, 2014




Two Definitions for Chronic Multisymptom Illness Afflicting Gulf War Veterans Should Guide VA Treatment and Research


WASHINGTON – Two existing definitions of chronic multisymptom illness (CMI) -- one by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and another from a study of Kansas Gulf War veterans -- should be used by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to guide research and treatment of Gulf War veterans, says a new report from the Institute of Medicine.  Determining which definition to use in different circumstances should be based on specific needs.  Furthermore, the term "Gulf War illness" should replace "chronic multisymptom illness" to reflect the group in which the illness manifests and the group's distinctive experiences, said the committee that wrote the report.   


The VA asked IOM to develop a case definition for CMI as it pertains to the veteran population who served during the 1990-1991 Gulf War, as well as recommend appropriate terminology for referring to CMI.  Case definitions enable health care providers to prescribe standard treatments and enroll patients into research and drug trials.  A case definition might be broad in its reach to recognize all people who have a disease but may inadvertently include some who do not.  However, a more specific definition might be too narrow and miss some individuals.  Researchers might desire a narrow case definition to assemble a study sample in which all the subjects have a high probability of being afflicted by a certain condition.  For physicians, a broader consensus case definition may be preferred to determine appropriate evaluation and treatment. 


Since the conflict in the Persian Gulf from 1990 to 1991, Gulf War veterans have experienced various unexplained symptoms that many associate with their service, but no specific exposure has been definitively associated with symptoms.  The wide variation in symptoms has complicated efforts to determine whether a distinctive illness exists, as many symptoms of CMI overlap with those of other diseases and conditions, such as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. 


The committee found no clinically validated tests or measures for diagnosing CMI and was unable to develop a new consensus definition of CMI given the lack of uniform symptoms, the variety of symptoms, and the long onset and duration.  Serious limitations in the methodologies for data collection and the analytic approaches used in many of the studies also undermined the committee's ability to present a single definition. 


The committee recommended that the VA use two current definitions -- the CDC and Kansas definitions -- because they capture the most common symptoms and will provide a framework for further treatment and research.  The CDC case definition, which has been widely used by researchers, identifies 29 percent to 60 percent of U.S. Gulf War-deployed veterans as CMI cases, depending on the population studied.  The Kansas definition identifies 34 percent as CMI cases in the Kansas Gulf War veterans studied.  The committee stressed that one definition should not be applied for all purposes, and instead researchers and clinicians should select one based on their needs.  The CDC definition is broad and has the greatest concordance with all the other definitions but is less restrictive than the Kansas definition.  For example, the CDC definition is effective for identifying as many individuals as possible.  It will likely include individuals who do not have CMI, whereas the Kansas definition will likely exclude some cases. 


"CMI is an important cause of disability among Gulf War veterans," said Kenneth Shine, chair of the committee and special adviser to the chancellor at the University of Texas System.  "The diversity and intensity of exposures and experiences, as well as the breadth and extent of symptoms, warrant workable definitions of the illness and nomenclature so the VA can advance research and administer effective treatments." 


The committee acknowledged that the two definitions cover most of the common CMI symptoms, but they do not reflect the complete array reported by Gulf War veterans.  Given the lag in time between first reports of CMI and epidemiologic study, lack of exposure monitoring, and the absence of validated laboratory tests, it is not possible to define many of the typical elements associated with a case definition, the committee said.  However, the VA should systematically assess existing data to identify additional features of CMI -- such as period of onset, duration, severity, and frequency of symptoms -- to produce a more robust case definition. 


The committee also recommended that the VA use the term Gulf War illness rather than chronic multisymptom illness.  The terminology associated with the symptoms changed over the years.  The term Gulf War syndrome was used initially, but numerous other terms have appeared in medical and scientific literature, including Gulf War illness, unexplained illness, medically unexplained symptoms, medically unexplained physical symptoms, and CMI.  Gulf War illness is reflective of both the geographic area and the unique experience of this group of veterans and has been used by many researchers, the committee said. 


The study was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.  Established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine provides independent, objective, evidence-based advice to policymakers, health professionals, the private sector, and the public.  The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies.  A committee roster follows.



Jennifer Walsh, Senior Media Relations Officer

Chelsea Dickson, Media Relations Associate

Office of News and Public Information

202-334-2138; e-mail

Twitter: @NAS_news and @NASciences

RSS feed:



Pre-publication copies of Chronic Multisymptom Illness in Gulf War Veterans: Case Definitions Re-examined are available from the National Academies Press on the Internet at or by calling 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242. Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).

#       #       #


Board on the Health of Select Populations


Committee on the Development of a Consensus Case Definition for Chronic Multisymptom Illness

in 1990-1991 Gulf War Veterans


Kenneth I. Shine, M.D. (chair)

Special Adviser to the Chancellor

University of Texas System



Floyd E. Bloom, M.D.

Professor Emeritus

Molecular and Integrative Neuroscience Department

Scripps Research Institute

La Jolla, Calif.


Karon F. Cook, Ph.D.

Research Associate Professor in Medical Social Sciences

Feinberg School of Medicine
Northwestern University



Deborah A. Cory-Slechta, Ph.D.


Department of Environmental Medicine

School of Medicine and Dentistry

University of Rochester

Rochester, N.Y.


Fred Friedberg, Ph.D.

Research Associate Professor

Applied Behavioral Medicine Research Institute

Stony Brook University Hospital

Stony Brook University

Stony Brook, N.Y.


Joanna G. Katzman, M.D., M.B.A.

Associate Professor of Neurology
School of Medicine

University of New Mexico



Howard M. Kipen, Ph.D., M.Ph., M.D.

Professor of Environmental and Occupational Medicine and Chief

Clinical Research and Occupational Medicine Division

Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey



Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor and Director

Psychiatry Biostatistics and Methodology Core

Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center



James Levenson, M.D.

Chairman, Consultation and Liaison Psychiatry

Department of Psychiatry

Virginia Commonwealth University



Catherine Lomen-Hoerth, Ph.D., M.D.

Neurologist and Director

ALS Center

USCF Medical Center

University of California

San Francisco


Thomas J. Mason, Ph.D.


Department of Environmental and Occupational Health

University of South Florida



Linda Anh B. Nguyen, M.D.

Clinical Assistant Professor, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

Director, GI Motility and Neurogastroenterology

Division of Gastroenterology

Stanford School of Medicine

Redwood City, Calif.


F. Javier Nieto, Ph.D., M.D.

Helfaer Professor of Public Health and Professor of Population Health Sciences and Family Medicine

Department of Population Health Sciences

School of Medicine and Public Health

University of Wisconsin



Anne L. Oaklander, Ph.D., M.D.

Associate Professor of Neurology

Harvard Medical School, and

Associate in Neurology

Massachusetts General Hospital



Ron F. Teichman, M.D.


West Orange, N.J.


Suzanne D. Vernon, Ph.D.


CFIDS Association of America

Charlotte, N.C.




Carolyn Fulco

Study Director