Date:  Aug. 6, 2012




New Approaches Needed for Uncovering, Identifying, and Treating

Buried Chemical Warfare Materiel; Program Requires Organizational, Technological Changes


WASHINGTON — The current approach for identifying and destroying buried chemical munitions and related chemical warfare materials uncovered during environmental remediation projects is neither reliable enough nor has the capability to efficiently tackle large-scale projects, says a new report from the National Research Council.  An alternative or modified approach is needed to remediate the Redstone Arsenal and other such projects on active and former U.S. Department of Defense sites and ranges.


Additionally, the report recommends that the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Army each select a single office to manage and fund recovered chemical warfare materiel (RCWM) remediation activities for DOD.  Currently, authority and funding for RCWM activities depend on how and where the materiel is discovered, and could fall under multiple offices of either the secretary of defense or the Army Secretariat.  The Army mission for RCWM remediation is turning into a much larger program that will rival those for conventional munition and hazardous substance cleanup, the report says, and is expected to cost billions of dollars over several years.  A clear organizational structure and long-term funding are needed.  


The secretary of the Army should also establish a new position at the level of the senior executive service (civilian) or a general officer (military) to lead the RCWM program.  The secretary should delegate full responsibility and accountability for RCWM program performance to this person, including for planning, budgeting, and execution and for day-to-day oversight, guidance, management, and direction of the program. 


Following a 1985 directive from Congress, the Army has undertaken the monumental task of destroying the existing U.S. stockpile of chemical weapons.  To date, 90 percent of the stockpile has been destroyed, and the remaining 10 percent is expected to be destroyed by 2022.  However, during the early- to mid-20th century, chemical weapons and chemical warfare materiel were often disposed of by open pit burning and burial at approximately 250 sites in 40 states, the District of Columbia, and three territories.  Remediation of this buried materiel, in addition to environmental cleanup of the burial sites, therefore poses significant challenges to the nation and DOD.  The report examines important regulatory issues that ultimately affect the need, timing, and costs of remediating these sites.  Federal and state environmental remediation policies address whether buried CWM must be excavated and destroyed or contained in place.


To destroy any intact chemical munitions uncovered during remediation efforts, teams will most likely use either the Army's Explosive Destruction System (EDS) or one of three commercially available technologies.  The EDS is an effective and reliable technology, and the Army has an active research and development program under way to improve the throughput rate, or speed at which chemicals can be identified.  The three commercially available destruction technologies have higher throughput rates, but reliability problems were encountered when one of these -- the Dynasafe Static Detonation Chamber -- was recently used to destroy a portion of stockpiled munitions in Anniston, Ala.  The report recommends ways to alleviate these problems and suggests alternatives to the EDS and commercial systems.  Also explored is the potential use of robotic systems to access and remove buried CWM.


The lack of an accurate inventory of buried munitions and of a reliable cost estimate for the RCWM program makes it difficult to establish precise, long-term budget requirements and draw up a funding plan for an RCWM program going forward that has the level of certainty typically associated with DOD project implementation.  The report recommends as a "matter of urgency" that the secretary of defense increase funding for the remediation of chemical warfare materiel to enable the Army to complete the inventories of known and suspected buried chemical munitions no later than 2013 and develop a quantitative basis for overall funding of the program, with updates as needed to facilitate accurate budget forecasts.  Pending establishment of a final RCWM management structure, this task should be assigned to the director of the Army's Chemical Materials Agency as chair of the provisional RCWM integrating office.


Redstone Arsenal facility in Alabama -- the site with the largest quantity of buried CWM in the U.S., and which has groundwater contamination -- is presented as a case study to show how issues raised in the report can be practically applied. 


The study was sponsored by the U.S. Army's Chemical Materials Agency.  The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies.  They are private, nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and health policy advice under a congressional charter.  The Research Council is the principal operating agency of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering.  For more information, visit  A committee roster follows.



Lorin Hancock, Media Relations Officer

Luwam Yeibio, Media Relations Assistant

Office of News and Public Information

202-334-2138; e-mail


Pre-publication copies of Remediation of Buried Chemical Warfare Materiel are available from the National Academies Press; tel. 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242 or on the Internet at  Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).

#       #       #



Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences

Board on Army Science and Technology


Committee on Review of the Conduct of Operations for Remediation of Recovered

Chemical Warfare Materiel from Burial Sites


Richard J. Ayen (chair)
Director of Technology
Waste Management Inc. (retired)
Jamestown, R.I.


Douglas M. Medville (vice chair)
Program Leader for Chemical Materiel Disposal and Remediation
MITRE Corp. (retired)
Highlands Ranch, Colo.

Dwight A. Beranek
Senior Vice President
Michael Baker Jr. Inc. (retired)
Brandenton, Fla.

Edward L. Cussler Jr.*
Distinguished Institute Professor
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science
University of Minnesota


Gilbert F. Decker
Executive Vice President
Walt Disney Imagineering (retired)
Los Gatos, Calif.


Clair F. Gill

Chief of Staff and Deputy Director of the Office of Facilities,

Engineering, and Operations

Smithsonian Institution (retired)
McLean, Va.

Derek Guest
Derek Guest Environmental and Sustainability Solutions

Pittsford, N.Y.


Todd A. Kimmell
Principal Investigator
Argonne National Laboratory
Gaithersburg, Md.


JoAnn Slama Lighty
Professor and Chair
Department of Chemical Engineering
University of Utah
Salt Lake City

James P. Pastorick
UXO Pro Inc.

Alexandria, Va.


Jean D. Reed
Distinguished Research Fellow
National Defense
University Center for Technology and National Security

Washington, D.C.

William R. Rhyne
Independent Consultant
Kingston, Tenn.

Tiffany N. Thomas
Environmental Scientist
Tetra Tech Inc.
Paradise Valley, Ariz.

William J. Walsh
Attorney and Partner
Pepper Hamilton LLP
Washington, D.C.

Lawrence J. Washington
Corporate Vice President for Sustainability and Environmental Health and Safety
Dow Chemical Co. (retired)
Midland, Mich.




Nancy Schulte

Study Director



* Member, National Academy of Engineering