Date: Oct. 8, 1998
Contacts: Cheryl Greenhouse, Media Relations Officer
Kristen Nye, Media Relations Assistant
(202) 334-2138; e-mail <email@example.com>New Research Needed to Improve Detection, Identification Techniques for Finding Pipe Bombs, Catching Bomb Makers
WASHINGTON -- Increased research is the key to developing more widely applicable detection systems to find pipe bombs before they explode and to help catch the perpetrators when a bomb has gone off, says a new report
from a committee of the National Research Council.
At the same time, improvements must be made to databases that contain identification information about certain types of black and smokeless powder, and to databases that track bombing statistics, to improve the effectiveness of these systems for use as law enforcement and policy-making tools.
"X-ray systems, metal detectors, and specially trained dogs provide a strong capability for detecting bomb containers and unmarked black and smokeless powders in several different situations," said committee chair Edwin P. Przybylowicz, retired from Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, N.Y. "And much of the physical evidence left behind after an explosion is often very helpful in identifying and prosecuting the bombers. In order to guard against future threats, however, the committee believes that the government should study more-complex detection and identification methods so that policy-makers are better able to react if circumstances arise that warrant a more aggressive response."
Additional research aimed at gaining a better understanding of how or which chemical or physical additives could be included in black and smokeless powders without affecting the performance of the powders might help law enforcement in the future if these types of bombings become more prevalent.
Black and smokeless powders are widely used for sport and recreation throughout the United States. They are sold primarily for use in the reloading of ammunition and in muzzle-loading firearms. Large quantities of the powders are used for military purposes as well. But black and smokeless powders also are utilized to manufacture pipe bombs -- the type of illegal bomb most commonly used in the United States.
Between 1992 and 1996, the number of reported actual and attempted bombings involving these types of powders averaged about 650 per year in the United States, the committee said. In these incidents, approximately 10 people were killed, 100 people were injured, and $1million in property damage was reported each year. A significant number of the deaths and injuries are suffered by the people who are constructing or transporting the bombs. Although these statistics may not warrant immediate restrictive policy changes, alternatives must be developed if the bombing threat increases.Detecting the Bombs
There are three basic scenarios under which law enforcement and security personnel can detect bombs before they explode: the portal, suspicious package, and bomb threat scenarios. In the portal scenario, which is widely used in airports, all people or packages entering an area must pass through a few well-monitored checkpoints. Because containers with strong, dense walls are needed to make effective powder-based explosive devices, the containers are likely to be visible on standard X-ray systems. Additionally, metal detectors easily discover pipe bombs made with metal containers or fuses, and dogs can be trained to find devices containing any type of powder. However, dogs may tire quickly and are not well-suited to the task of routine screening of the large volumes of material scanned through checkpoints.
In the suspicious package scenario, portable X-ray systems can be used to reveal the type of explosive device and its location within a package. Dogs also are known to be very effective at detecting explosives in this scenario. In the bomb threat scenario, the only effective method for locating bombs in a large area is a search by dogs or bomb squads. Because dogs combine a strong sense of smell with the ability to search by themselves, they have a major advantage over other detection systems in this situation.
Further research is needed on canine detection of bombs that are made with black and smokeless powders enclosed in various containers, the committee said. Better knowledge of how dogs detect these devices would allow law enforcement personnel to use dogs more efficiently when searching large areas, and would assist in the development of instruments capable of mimicking the methods by which dogs detect powders. In addition, more research on markers is needed to determine whether they could be added to black and smokeless powders safely and effectively. These markers might help bomb squads search broad areas or screen large numbers of packages more quickly.Identifying the Bomb Makers
Much physical evidence typically can be recovered after a blast in which black or smokeless powder is used. These items may include unburned powder, chemical products of the reaction, and parts of the device such as the container used to enclose the powder, the triggering or delay mechanisms, and adhesive tape. Identifying and tracing the origin of these components -- including determining the brand and product line of the powder used -- may aid in identifying and eventually convicting the bomber.
Both the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and the Federal Bureau of Investigation maintain separate databases of commercial powder samples that can help to identify residual powder found at a bomb scene. The Research Council committee recommended that these databases be consolidated and made more comprehensive to increase their value as law enforcement tools.
Identification taggants -- materials coded with information that can be added to the powder by the manufacturer and read by investigators before or after detonation -- and an associated record-keeping system could be of further assistance in tracking down bombers in cases where current forensic techniques fail, the committee said. But additional research on these systems is needed to determine whether they are safe and effective.
Federally funded research on taggants in explosives has been suspended since 1981, leaving many unanswered questions about the compatibility of taggants with the wide variety of black and smokeless powder products currently available. Although taggants have been added to a limited number of explosives in Switzerland since 1981, no tagging system has been fully tested to demonstrate its technical feasibility for use in all types of black and smokeless powders.
Research should be conducted to develop and test taggants that would be technically suitable for inclusion in black and smokeless powders should the future threat level warrant their use, the committee said. To enable policy-makers to accurately determine the threat from bombings involving these powders, a single, national database on bombing statistics that is comprehensive, searchable, and up-to-date should be established.
The National Research Council is the principal operating arm of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering. It is a private, non-profit institution that provides independent advice on science and technology issues under a congressional charter. The report was requested by Congress and funded by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. A committee roster follows.
Copies of Black and Smokeless Powders: Technologies for Finding Bombs and the Bomb Makers
are available at www.nap.edu
or by calling 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242. Reporters may obtain a pre-publication copy from the Office of News and Public Information at the letterhead address (contacts listed above).
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications
Board on Chemical Sciences and TechnologyCommittee on Smokeless and Black PowderEdwin P. Przybylowicz
Senior Vice President and Director of Research
Eastman Kodak Co. (retired)
Rochester, N.Y.Margaret A. Berger
Suzanne J. and Norman Miles Professor of Law
Brooklyn Law School
Brooklyn, N.Y.Alexander Beveridge
Head, Chemistry Section
Royal Canadian Mounted Police Forensic Laboratory (retired)
VancouverLeo R. Gizzi
Christiansburg, Va.Janice M. Hiroms
Crosby, TexasKarl V. Jacob
Global Technical Leader
Solids Processing Laboratory
The Dow Chemical Co.
Midland, Mich.Charles Parmenter
Research Center for Energetic Materials
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
SocorroWalter F. Rowe
Professor and Chair
Department of Forensic Sciences
George Washington University
Washington, D.C.Roger L. Schneider
Rho Sigma Associates Inc.
Whitefish Bay, Wis.Ronald L. Simmons
Senior Technologist and Project Manager
Naval Surface Warfare Center
Indianhead, Md.Judith B. Snow
Head, High Explosives Science and Technology Group
Dynamic Experimentation Division
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Los Alamos, N.M.Ronald R. Vandebeek
Canadian Explosives Research Laboratory
Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology
OttawaRaymond S. Voorhees
Manager, Physical Evidence Section
Forensic and Technical Services Division
U.S. Postal Inspection Service
RESEARCHCOUNCILSTAFFDouglas J. Raber
(1) Member, National Academy of Engineering
(2 )Member, National Academy of Sciences