Date: Aug. 20, 1998
Contacts: Dan Quinn, Media Relations Officer
Dumi Ndlovu, Media Relations Assistant
(202) 334-2138; e-mail <firstname.lastname@example.org>Science-Based, Unified Approach NeededTo Safeguard the Nation's Food Supply
WASHINGTON -- Outdated food safety laws and a fragmented federal structure serve as barriers to improving protection of the nation's food supply from contamination or other hazards, according to Ensuring Safe Food From Production to Consumption,
a new congressionally mandated report from a committee of the Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council. Federal officials should adopt a science-based approach that helps them prevent, identify, and target the largest threats. Arcane safety laws must be repealed, and one individual should be appointed to provide a single point of leadership to implement a comprehensive plan that pulls together efforts currently spread across at least 12 federal agencies.
"The United States has some of the attributes of an effective food safety system, but it lacks a central authority and is hampered by old laws that don't allow flexible responses to today's threats," said committee chair John C. Bailar III, chair of the department of health studies at the University of Chicago. "As the challenges to ensuring safe food change and grow more complex, it is crucial that we rethink how to address the greatest threats to human health."
Some 9,000 deaths and 81 million illnesses each year have been attributed to consumption of contaminated food in the United States. Increasing reliance on minimally processed fresh fruits and vegetables, emergence of new strains of food-borne bacteria, the centralization and growth of large food distributors, consumer preference for ready-to-eat foods, and a growing number of people at high risk for severe or fatal food-borne illnesses have placed new stresses on the system in recent years. Currently, federal agencies responsible for food safety often lack coordination and consistency in their missions, policies, regulations, and enforcement practices, are not well-integrated with state and local activities, and are too driven by responding to crises rather than by planning ways to prevent them, the report says.
The report recommends that:
> The food safety system should be based on science. With limited resources to address safety issues, regulatory priorities should be supported by strong scientific evidence that aims at prevention when possible, and identifies and addresses the greatest threats, including microbiological pathogens, naturally occurring toxins, allergens, food additives, agricultural chemicals, environmental contaminants, animal drug residues, excessive consumption of some dietary supplements, and improper methods of handling and preparing food.
> Congress should establish a unified, central framework for managing food safety programs, headed by one official with control of resources for all federal food safety activities. This person would have responsibility for management of food-borne disease outbreaks, setting standards for food safety, inspection, monitoring, disease surveillance, risk assessment, regulation enforcement, research, and education. Although many members of the committee believe that the best arrangement would be to establish a single food safety agency, federal officials may be able to address the needs identified in the report through other organizational structures. All options meeting the criteria of an effective system should be carefully reviewed before the final organizational structure is determined.
> Congress should change federal statutes so that inspection, research, and enforcement are based on scientifically supportable assessments of risk. Some outmoded safety statutes, such as the visual inspection system for meat and poultry, may even detract from protection efforts by diverting resources from implementation of science-based inspection reforms. At a minimum, Congress should no longer require inspection of each animal carcass, as required by laws controlling meat and poultry inspection. Congress also should mandate a single set of regulations for all foods, and should specify that foods be imported only from countries with food inspection systems deemed equivalent to that of the United States. Additional resources should be devoted to prevention and to implementing the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point system used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration to detect or control for potential hazards at each step, from raw material to the finished product.
> A comprehensive national food safety plan should be developed. The plan should support research aimed at prevention and detection of risks, and include surveillance needed to monitor changes in the food supply or consumption that might pose new risks. It should further integrate federal efforts with state and local activities, while addressing the distinctive hazards associated with Americans' increasing reliance on imported foods.
The current food safety system has evolved piecemeal over the past century in response to changes in the food supply. Although efforts have been made to modernize it -- most recently with the president's National Food Safety Initiative of 1997 -- such efforts take only the first steps toward an effective national approach, the report says.
Although the Food and Drug Administration issued a Food Code in 1993 with recommended standards for handling food, it has not yet been adopted by many state or local authorities. The federal government should mandate adherence to minimum standards for food products and processes, the committee said, and allocate adequate funding to help support state and local food safety activities.
A committee roster follows. The Institute of Medicine is a private, non-profit organization that provides health policy advice under a congressional charter granted to the National Academy of Sciences. The National Research Council is the principal operating arm of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering. The study was sponsored by U.S. Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service.
Read the full text of Ensuring Safe Food From Production to Consumption
are available at www.nap.edu
or by calling 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242. Reporters may obtain a pre-publication copy from the Office of News and Public Information at the letterhead address (contacts listed above).INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
Food and Nutrition Board
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
Board on AgricultureCommittee to Ensure Safe Food from Production to ConsumptionJohn C. Bailar III, M.D., Ph.D.(1) (chair)
Department of Health Studies
University of ChicagoCarole A. Bisogni, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, and
Associate Director for Academic Affairs
Division of Nutritional Sciences
Ithaca, N.Y.David L. Call, Ph.D.
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Ithaca, N.Y.Marsha N. Cohen, J.D.
Professor of Law
Hastings College of the Law
University of California
San FranciscoMichael P. Doyle, Ph.D.
Regents Professor of Food Microbiology, and
Director, Center for Food Safety and Quality Enhancement
University of Georgia
GriffinDelia A. Hammock
Good Housekeeping Institute
New York CityLonnie J. King, D.V.M.
College of Veterinary Medicine
Michigan State University
East LansingGilbert A. Leveille, Ph.D.
Denville, N.J.Richard A. Merrill, L.L.B.(1)
Daniel Caplin Professor of Law
University of Virginia School of Law
CharlottesvilleSanford A. Miller, Ph.D.
Dean, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, and
Professor, Departments of Biochemistry and Medicine
University of Texas Health Science Center
San AntonioHarley W. Moon, D.V.M., Ph.D.(2)
F.K. Ramsey Chair of Veterinary Medicine
Veterinary Medical Research Institute
Iowa State University
AmesMichael T. Osterholm, Ph.D.
State Epidemiologist, and
Chief, Acute Disease Epidemiology Section
Minnesota Department of Health
MinneapolisThomas D. Trautman, Ph.D.
Principal Scientist, Toxicology and Regulatory Affairs
STAFFAllison A. Yates
Study DirectorCharlotte Kirk Baer
Senior Program OfficerSandra Schlicker
Senior Program Officer_________________________________________
(1) Member, Institute of Medicine
(2) Member, National Academy of Sciences