Date: June 30, 1998
Contacts: Cheryl Greenhouse, Media Relations Officer
Sean McLaughlin, Media Relations Assistant
(202) 334-2138; e-mail <firstname.lastname@example.org>[EMBARGOED: NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE BEFORE 10 A.M. EDT TUESDAY, JUNE 30]Publication AnnouncementLessons Offer Solutions for Future International Space Collaborations
As potential partnerships for space programs emerge and budget cutbacks continue, opportunities for international collaborations look both promising and daunting. In the United States, there is a move toward increasing the number of smaller space science missions operating for shorter durations. Across the Atlantic, the European Union has adopted a broader role in space policy. On both sides, there is growing interest in opportunities for commercial space ventures. Budgetary constraints faced by space agencies make international missions more appealing for sharing costs, but at the same time have led to internal administrative changes that could hinder successful cooperative efforts.
Lessons learned from 30 years of U.S.-European cooperation in space research can help address these challenges and strengthen future programs, including large projects such as the International Space Station, says a new report from a joint committee of the National Research Council and the European Science Foundation. Cooperation in space research has led to more than 100 missions, which have varied in scope, complexity, and success. They include international scientific achievements such as the confirmation of evidence of black holes in the central regions of galaxies, which was provided by the Hubble Space Telescope in 1997. The most detailed views ever obtained of the sun's atmosphere and corona from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory were achieved in a cooperative mission launched in 1995 by NASA and the European Space Agency.
In its report, U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science,
the committee examined several space missions, including 13 case studies, and identified factors that have helped or hindered international space ventures. The findings of this first comprehensive study of U.S.-European cooperation in space sciences also have implications for international scientific cooperation as a whole, the committee noted. Elements crucial for successful international cooperation in future space programs include the following:Scientific goals and rationale.
First and foremost, missions should not be undertaken solely because they are international in scope. To ensure that a mission is justified for scientific reasons, proposals should be peer reviewed by experts who can verify that the science is of excellent quality, meets high international standards, is cost-effective, and benefits all countries involved.
In joint missions, language and cultural differences between international partners are not the only barriers that must be overcome. One of the most important lessons learned from years of space research was that communication problems between the engineering and scientific communities and a lack of common objectives can disrupt missions. Close interaction among scientists and engineers -- for example, at the design phase -- is particularly important when compromises are needed between scientific goals and technical feasibility.
Among other aspects important for multilateral cooperation are having clearly defined responsibilities, a sound plan for accessing and distributing data, and obvious benefits from collaboration.Independent periodic assessments.
For each cooperative mission, the participating space agencies should appoint an independent group to regularly assess the project's scientific vitality, timeliness, and operations. The group also should examine whether the program should be extended or receive further funding.Milestone agreements among partners.
In the past, international partners signed a single agreement when embarking on a project. The interests of all parties would be best served, however, if additional agreements could be decided upon as the mission's scope is further defined and developed. The report outlines a hierarchy of agreements that can be used for this purpose, including letters to confirm proposed management, implementation, and scheduling of a program.Support for international activities.
In light of continuing budget cutbacks, the uncertainties of the U.S. funding process, and the importance of trustworthy international agreements for collaborative space programs, the joint committee recommended that NASA's funding include specific allocations for important, peer-reviewed, moderately sized international activities.
The study was funded by NASA and the European Science Foundation, an association of more than 60 major national funding agencies devoted to basic scientific research in more than 20 countries. The National Research Council is the principal operating agency of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering. It is a private, non-profit institution that provides science advice under a congressional charter. A committee roster follows.
are available from the National Academy Press for $36.00 (prepaid) plus shipping charges of $4.00 for the first copy and $.50 for each additional copy; tel. (202) 334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242. Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).
Read the full text of U.S.-European Collaboration in Space Science
for free on the Web, as well as more than 1,800 other publications from the National Academies. Printed copies are available for purchase from the National Academy Press Web site
or at the mailing address in the letterhead; tel. (202) 334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242. Reporters may obtain a pre-publication copy from the Office of News and Public Information at the letterhead address (contacts listed above).NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications
Space Studies BoardEUROPEAN SCIENCE FOUNDATION
European Space Science CommitteeCommittee on International Space ProgramsU.S. MembersBerrien Moore III (chair)University of New HampshireDurhamRobert J. BayuzickVanderbilt UniversityNashville, Tenn.Robert E. ClelandUniversity of WashingtonSeattleBill GreenU.S. House of Representatives (former member)New York CityJonathan E. GrindlayHarvard UniversityCambridge, Mass.Joan Johnson-FreeseAir War CollegeMaxwell Air Force Base, Ala.Victor V. KlemasUniversity of DelawareNewarkDonald G. MitchellJohns Hopkins UniversityLaurel, Md.James MorrisonBDM Inc. (retired)Washington, D.C.S. Ichtiaque RasoolInternational Geosphere-Biosphere ProgramParis, andUniversity of New HampshireDurhamJohn A. SimpsonUniversity of ChicagoDarrell F. StrobelJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreEuropean MembersFrançois Becker (chair)International Space UniversityStrasbourg, FranceMichel BignierLa Réunion SpatialeParisA. Mike CruiseUniversity of BirminghamBirmingham, EnglandAlvaro GiménezLaboratory for Space Astrophysics and Theoretical PhysicsMadrid, SpainRobert J. GurneyUniversity of ReadingReading, EnglandGerhard HaerendelMax-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische PhysikGarching, GermanyManfred H. KellerDeutsche Forschungsanstalt für Luft und RaumfahrtCologne, GermanyJean-Claude LegrosMicrogravity Research Center, Free University of BrusselsBrussels, BelgiumDag LinnarssonKarolinska InstitutetStockholm, SwedenHerbert W. SchnopperSmithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (beginning May 1, 1997)Cambridge, Mass. Fred W. TaylorClarendon LaboratoryOxford, EnglandRESEARCH COUNCIL STAFFPamela WhitneyStudy Director