Contact Us | Current Operating Status
Office of News and Public Information
Back | Home
News from NASEM

Jan. 27, 2017




USAID Should Speed Application of Science, Technology, and Innovation to Global Development Challenges


WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Agency for International Development should speed its transformation into a global leader and catalyst in applying science, technology and innovation to the challenges facing developing countries, says a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.  In doing so, it should draw on resources from across U.S. government agencies, developing countries, the public and private research enterprise, research universities in the U.S. and abroad and other development agencies.


Among USAID’s top priorities should be scaling up successful interventions, strengthening host countries’ capacity to apply science and technology to their own development, and expanding investments in science, technology, and innovation that engage and empower women, the report says.


“In the long run, USAID’s focus on science, technology and innovation is critical to improve development outcomes,” said Michael Clegg, chair of the committee that wrote the report, former foreign secretary of the National Academy of Sciences, and professor emeritus at the University of California, Irvine. “Partnerships in all three of these areas can maximize the impact of individual and group efforts in order to reach millions – rather than just thousands – of people with unmet needs.”


In recent years, USAID has begun to transform itself from its traditional role of designing and wholly funding stand-alone projects in individual countries to that of a global broker of organizations and resources to achieve impacts that are broader, more sustainable, and more cost-effective. Appropriate partnerships with other donor nations/agencies and host nations are vital in reaching national and global development goals, says the new report.


USAID should elevate scaling of successful projects to be a core priority, in order to improve the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of interventions and to expand their impact, the report says. Emerging research on scaling points to the importance of particular steps – for example, planning for scaling impact from project inception, tracking progress closely, and building the business case for others to sustain service provision after a project concludes. Identifying private- and public-sector institutions for scaling success is essential. Because scaling can involve commercialization of publicly funded efforts, private-sector advisers and partners will have much to offer, the report notes.


Another overarching goal for USAID should be to invest in strengthening host countries’ institutional capacity to apply science, technology and innovation in their own development, and to ensure training of individuals in higher education and professional schools, both in-country and in U.S. universities. The agency should develop a broad range of programs to support efforts to build capacity for research in host countries, such as top-quality, relevant training for students at various levels; support for science institutions; and strengthening of regulatory bodies.


In addition, USAID should expand investments in science, technology, and innovation that engage and empower women, the report says. Expanding women’s opportunities leads to better living conditions through improvements in education, health, and agriculture, and through access to technology and economic opportunities.  And empowering women through education and access to the formal economy can sharply increase the global human potential to address societal challenges. In addition to gender analyses of initiatives specifically targeted at equality and empowerment, each mission director should ensure that all science, technology, and innovation projects consider gender at all stages of a project cycle.


The study was sponsored by the U.S. Agency for International Development. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are private, nonprofit institutions that provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions related to science, technology, and medicine. They operate under an 1863 congressional charter to the National Academy of Sciences, signed by President Lincoln. For more information, visit  A roster follows.


Sara Frueh, Media Relations Officer

Rebecca Ray, Media Relations Assistant

Office of News and Public Information

202-334-2138; e-mail

Follow us on Twitter @theNASEM

Copies of The Role of Science, Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships in the Future of the U.S. Agency for International Development are available at or by calling 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242. Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).



Policy and Global Affairs Division
Development, Security, and Cooperation



Committee on the Role of Science, Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships in the Future of the U.S. Agency for International Development


M.T. Clegg1 (chair)

Professor Emeritus

University of California



DeAndra Beck

Associate Dean for Research

International Studies and Programs

Michigan State University

East Lansing


Thomas J. Bollyky

Senior Fellow for Global Health, Economics, and Development

Council on Foreign Relations

Washington, D.C.


Gargee Ghosh

Director of Development Policy and Finance

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Washington, D.C.


Julie A. Howard

Senior Advisor to the Associate Provost and Dean

International Studies and Programs

Michigan State University

East Lansing


Christine L. Moe

Gangarosa Professor of Safe Water and Sanitation

Rollins School of Public Health

Emory University



Francis J. Ricciardone


American University in Cairo

Cairo, Egypt


Rebecca R. Richards-Kortum1,2

Malcolm Gillis University Professor

Rice University



Melanie Walker

Senior Adviser to the President

The World Bank

Washington, D.C.


Amos Winter

Assistant Professor

Massachusetts Institute of Technology





Richard E. Bissell

Study Director


1Member, National Academy of Sciences

2Member, National Academy of Engineering