National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Engineering
Institute of Medicine
National Research Council
Office of News and Public Information
National Academy of Engineering
Back | Home
News from the National Academies

Date: Feb. 20, 2014

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

DOD Programs to Prevent Psychological Disorders in Military Members, Families Need to Be Based on Scientific Evidence to Ensure Effectiveness, Says New IOM Report

 

WASHINGTON – As the U.S. Department of Defense advances its efforts to evaluate and improve psychological health services for military members and their families, it should develop, track, and evaluate programs based on scientific evidence to ensure their effectiveness, says a new report from the Institute of Medicine.  DOD has implemented numerous resilience and prevention programs -- mostly focused on individual-level interventions -- that address various aspects of psychological health.  While some of these programs have demonstrated effectiveness, many are not evidence-based and are evaluated infrequently. 

 

“Increasing rates of mental health problems among service members and the related psychological toll on families point to an urgent need to prevent and mitigate these conditions,” said Kenneth Warner, chair of the committee that wrote the report and Avedis Donabedian Distinguished University Professor of Public Health at the University of Michigan.  “DOD should rigorously evaluate any new programs that are developed to do so, because we remain uncertain about which approaches work and which ones are ineffective.”

 

From 2000 to 2011, 936,283 current or former service members were diagnosed with a psychological condition; such diagnoses increased by about 62 percent among active-duty service members during approximately the same time frame.  Adjustment disorders, such as feeling stressed or hopeless, made up 26 percent of the diagnoses; depression 17 percent; and anxiety disorders (excluding post-traumatic stress disorder) 10 percent.  PTSD accounted for 6 percent, while alcohol and substance abuse and dependence made up 17 percent.

 

In response to the surge of veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan with various problems, Congress required DOD to study their physical and mental health and other readjustment needs.  The IOM conducted such an assessment, which resulted in the 2013 report Returning Home from Iraq and Afghanistan: Assessment of Readjustment Needs of Veterans, Service Members, and Their Families.  This new report is a follow-up to examine the quality and evidence base of programs in DOD designed to prevent negative psychological health outcomes among service members and their families and to identify appropriate performance measures for such programs.

 

DOD screens at multiple points throughout the military life cycle to provide early recognition and interventions for psychological health needs of service members and their families who are at high risk.  It also implements structural interventions that support improved mental health assessment and care -- such as embedded mental health providers, the "patient-centered medical home," and Re-engineering Systems of Primary Care Treatment in the Military (RESPECT-Mil).  While DOD has adopted these numerous resilience and prevention programs, gaps exist in the evidence supporting their effectiveness.  For example, based on internal research data that show only very small effects, DOD concluded that Comprehensive Soldier and Family Fitness -- a broadly implemented program intended to foster resilience and enhance performance -- is effective, despite external evaluations that dispute that conclusion.

 

In addition, the committee was unable to identify any evidence-based programs to prevent domestic abuse across DOD services.  Though the services use a number of interventions to prevent sexual assaults, a DOD review found that components needed to measure their effectiveness are missing.  Furthermore, DOD does not systematically consider cost-effectiveness to ensure that resources are directed to programs that see the greatest results per dollar spent.

 

Certain strategies with strong evidence of effectiveness are underused, the committee said, such as restricting access to personal firearms to prevent suicide or homicide in domestic violence cases or placing restrictions on the sale of alcohol to reduce substance misuse.  In place of these proven approaches, the committee typically found unsubstantiated interventions such as campaigns, Internet tools, or in-person events, which may be effective but are seldom evaluated.

 

DOD has many family-focused prevention programs, but here, too, there are gaps in the evidence supporting their effectiveness, the report says.  It recommends that DOD implement comprehensive, well-supported programs to prevent psychological health problems in the families of service members, targeting risks and vulnerabilities such as family violence, substance abuse, and stress reaction.

 

The report was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense.  Established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine provides independent, objective, evidence-based advice to policymakers, health professionals, the private sector, and the public.  The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies.  A committee roster follows.

 

Contacts:

Jennifer Walsh, Senior Media Relations Officer

Molly Galvin, Senior Media Relations Officer

Chelsea Dickson, Media Relations Associate

Office of News and Public Information

202-334-2138; e-mail news@nas.edu

http://national-academies.com/newsroom

Twitter: @NAS_news and @NASciences

RSS feed: http://www.nationalacademies.org/rss/index.html

Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nationalacademyofsciences/sets

Pre-publication copies of Preventing Psychological Disorders in Service Members and Their Families: An Assessment of Programs are available from the National Academies Press on the Internet at
http://www.nap.edu or by calling 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242.  Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).

 

# # #

 

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE

Board on the Health of Select Populations

 

Committee on the Assessment of Resiliency and Prevention Programs for Mental and Behavioral Health in Service Members and Their Families

 

Kenneth E. Warner, Ph.D. (chair)

Avedis Donabedian Distinguished University Professor of Public Health

Department of Health Management and Policy

School of Public Health

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor

 

Hortensia de los Angeles Amaro, Ph.D.

Associate Vice Provost for Community Research Initiatives and

Dean's Professor of Social Work and Prevention Medicine

Keck School of Medicine

University of Southern California

Los Angeles

 

Frederic Blow, Ph.D.

Professor of Psychiatry

Department of Psychiatry

University of Michigan Medical School; and

Director, Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC) 

Ann Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research

U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs

Ann Arbor

 

Raul Caetano, M.D.

Regional Dean and Professor

School of Public Health

University of Texas, and

Dean and Professor

School of Health Professionals

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas

 

Jacquelyn C. Campbell, Ph.D., R.N.

Anna D. Wolf Chair and Professor
School of Nursing

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore

 

Joyce D. Essien, M.D., M.B.A.

Retired Captain

U.S. Public Health Service; and

Retired Director

Center for Public Health Practice

Rollins School of Public Health

Emory University

Atlanta

 

Lisa Jaycox, Ph.D.

Senior Behavioral Scientist

RAND Corp.

Arlington, Va.

 

Mary Jo Larson, Ph.D.

Senior Scientist

Heller School of Social Policy and Management

Brandeis University

Waltham, Mass.

 

Patricia Lester, M.D.

Jane and Marc Nathanson Family Professor of Psychiatry, and

Director, Nathanson Family Resilience Center

University of California

Los Angeles

 

Donald L. Patrick, Ph.D., M.S.P.H.

Professor

SeaQoL Group

Department of Health Services

School of Public Health

University of Washington

Seattle

 

Rhonda J. Robinson Beale, M.D.

Chief Medical Officer

OptumHealth Behavioral Solutions

Glendale, Calif.

 

M. David Rudd, Ph.D.

Provost

University of Memphis

Memphis, Tenn.

 

Naomi M. Simon, M.D.

Associate Professor

Department of Psychiatry

Harvard Medical School;

Director, Center for Anxiety and Traumatic Stress Disorders, and

Director, Complicated Grief Program

Massachusetts General Hospital; and

Chief Medical Officer

Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Home Base Program

Boston

 

STAFF

 

Laura Aiuppa Denning

Study Director