National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Engineering
Institute of Medicine
National Research Council
Office of News and Public Information
National Academy of Engineering
Back | Home
News from the National Academies

 

Date:  Sept. 10, 2013

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

 

 

Quality of Science and Engineering at National Security Labs Is Solid, But Work Environment and Technical Issues Need to Be Addressed

 

WASHINGTON — The science and engineering capabilities that underpin the nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship and nonproliferation missions at the nation’s three national security laboratories are “healthy and vibrant,” says a new report from the National Research Council.  The committee that wrote the report found no problems with the quality of science and engineering that would prevent certification of the stockpile. However, the report identifies several issues that, if not addressed, have the potential to erode the ability to perform high-quality work at the laboratories.

 

Congress asked the Research Council to review the quality of scientific research and engineering at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), which are part of the National Nuclear Security Administration.  This report is the second of the two-phase study; the first report, released in February 2012, examined management of the laboratories.

 

The new report examines the laboratories’ capabilities in four areas of fundamental importance to their primary missions: (1) weapons design; (2) system engineering and understanding of the effects of aging on system performance; (3) weapons science base; and (4) modeling and simulation. In many areas, science and engineering at the laboratories is of very high quality.  But the report identifies several stresses that could contribute to the deterioration of the work environment for scientists and engineers and limit the quality of their work in the future – and thus the nation’s ability to benefit fully from the laboratories’ potential. 

 

The United States declared a unilateral moratorium on nuclear weapons testing in 1992.  In the absence of new test data, the science-based stockpile stewardship program relies on pre-moratorium test data, computer models and simulations, surveillance, and other experiments . The laboratories are building enhanced computational models that account for changes in weapon properties as they age, and this requires state-of-the-art S&E capabilities in a number of areas, the report says.  NNSA should conduct a detailed assessment of simulation and modeling needs over the next decade and implement an adequately funded plan to meet those needs.

 

Experimental work is essential to the laboratories’ missions.  While the safety risks inherent in some experimentation must be controlled, the report says that the current system for managing these risks is contributing to escalating costs and schedule delays, and in some cases may limit experimentation.  The U.S. Department of Energy and NNSA should work with laboratory managers to review the system for assessing and mitigating these risks to improve efficiency while maintaining a safe working environment.

 

The laboratories maintain and operate world-class experimental facilities, but smaller experimental facilities are also essential for the laboratories to conduct their work and to attract and retain staff, the report says. For example, these smaller facilities are important for producing weapons components such as neutron generators or for processing plutonium and evaluating how it ages. The laboratory directors should ensure a proper balance between these small scientific facilities and the larger signature facilities.

 

..

 

The study was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration.  The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies.  They are private, independent nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and health policy advice under a congressional charter granted to NAS in 1863.  The Research Council is the principal operating agency of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering.  For more information, visit http://national-academies.org.  A committee roster follows.

 

Contacts:

Molly Galvin, Senior Media Relations Officer

Rachel Brody, Media Relations Assistant

Office of News and Public Information

202-334-2138; e-mail news@nas.edu

http://national-academies.org/newsroom

Twitter: @NAS_news and @NASciences

RSS feed: http://www.nationalacademies.org/rss/index.html

Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nationalacademyofsciences/sets

 

 

#       #       #

 

 

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL

Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences

Laboratory Assessments Board

 

Committee to Review the Quality of the Management and of the Science and Engineering Research at the Department of Energy National Security Laboratories – Phase 2

 


C. Kumar Patel1,2 (co-chair)

President and CEO

Pranalytica Inc.

Santa Monica, California

 

Charles Shank1,2 (co-chair)

Senior Fellow

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Janelia Farm Research Campus

Ashburn, Virginia

 

John Ahearne2

Executive Director Emeritus

Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

 

Christina Back

Advanced Nuclear Materials Leader

General Atomics

San Diego, California

 

Phillip Colella1

Senior Mathematician and Group Leader

Applied Numerical Algorithms Group

E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Berkeley, California

 

Jill Dahlburg

Superintendent

Space Sciences Division

Naval Research Laboratory

Washington, District of Columbia

 

Roger Falcone

Professor of Physics

Department of Physics

University of California

Berkeley, California

 

Yogendra Gupta

Director, Institute of Shock Physics

  and

Regents, Professor

Department of Physics

Washington State University

Pullman, Washington

 

Wick Haxton1

Professor of Physics

Department of Physics

University of California

Berkeley, California

 

Michael Hopkins

Professor

Department of Chemistry

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois

 

Raymond Jeanloz1

Professor of Earth and Planetary Science and Astronomy

University of California

Berkeley, California

 

John Kammerdiener

Independent Consultant

Marble Falls, Texas

 

William Martin

Professor of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences

Department of Nuclear Engineering

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan

 

Margaret Murnane1

Professor of Physics and Fellow

Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics

University of Colorado

Boulder, Colorado

 

Robert Nickell2

President

Applied Science and Technology

San Diego, California

 

Kenneth Peddicord

Professor of Nuclear Engineering, and

  Director, Nuclear Power Institute

Texas A&M University

College Station, Texas

 

Paul Peercy2

Dean Emeritus

College of Engineering

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin

 

Anthony Rollett

Professor and Head

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Carnegie Mellon University

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

 

Robert Rosner

William E. Wrather Distinguished Service Professor

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois

 

Robert Selden

Independent Consultant

Los Alamos, New Mexico

 

Kenneth Shea

Professor

Chemistry Department

University of California

Irvine, California

 

Francis Sullivan

Director

Super Computing Center

Center for Computing Sciences

Institute for Defense Analyses

Bowie, Maryland

 

Gary Was

Professor

Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan

 

Katherine Yelick

Associate Laboratory Director of Computer Sciences Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and

Professor, Electrical Engineering and

  Computer Sciences

Computer Science Division

University of California

Berkeley, California

 

 

STAFF

 

Alan Shaw

Study Director

 

Scott Weidman

Responsible Staff Officer

 

 

_________________________________________

1 Member, National Academy of Sciences

2 Member, National Academy of Engineering

3 Member, Institute of Medicine