National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Engineering
Institute of Medicine
National Research Council
Office of News and Public Information
National Academy of Engineering
Back | Home
News from the National Academies

Date:  Oct. 24, 2012

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

Large-Scale Production of Biofuels Made From Algae Poses Sustainability Concerns;

Further Innovations Needed to Reach Full Potential

 

WASHINGTON — Scaling up the production of biofuels made from algae to meet at least 5 percent -- approximately 39 billion liters -- of U.S. transportation fuel needs would place unsustainable demands on energy, water, and nutrients, says a new report from the National Research Council.  However, these concerns are not a definitive barrier for future production, and innovations that would require research and development could help realize algal biofuels' full potential.

 

Biofuels derived from algae and cyanobacteria are possible alternatives to petroleum-based fuels and could help the U.S. meet its energy security needs and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide (CO2).  Algal biofuels offer potential advantages over biofuels made from land plants, including algae's ability to grow on non-croplands in cultivation ponds of freshwater, salt water, or wastewater.  The number of companies developing algal biofuels has been increasing, and several oil companies are investing in them.  Given these and other interests, the National Research Council was asked to identify sustainability issues associated with large-scale development of algal biofuels.

 

The committee that wrote the report said that concerns related to large-scale algal biofuel development differ depending on the pathways used to produce the fuels.  Producing fuels from algae could be done in many ways, including cultivating freshwater or saltwater algae, growing algae in closed photobioreactors or open-pond systems, processing the oils produced by microalgae, or refining all parts of macroalgae.  The committee's sustainability analysis focused on pathways that to date have received active attention.  Most of the current development involves growing selected strains of algae in open ponds or closed photobioreactors using various water sources, collecting and extracting the oil from algae or collecting fuel precursors secreted by algae, and then processing the oil into fuel. 

 

The committee pointed out several high-level concerns for large-scale development of algal biofuel, including the relatively large quantity of water required for algae cultivation; magnitude of nutrients, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and CO2, needed for cultivation; amount of land area necessary to contain the ponds that grow the algae; and uncertainties in greenhouse gas emissions over the production life cycle.  Moreover, the algal biofuel energy return on investment would have to be high, meaning more energy would have to be produced from the biofuels than what is required to cultivate algae and convert them to fuels. 

           

The committee found that to produce the amount of algal biofuel equivalent to 1 liter of gasoline, between 3.15 liters to 3,650 liters of freshwater is required, depending on the production pathway.  Replenishing water lost from evaporation in growing systems is a key driver for use of freshwater in production, the committee said.  In addition, water use could be a serious concern in an algal biofuel production system that uses freshwater without recycling the "harvest" water.

 

To produce 39 billion liters of algal biofuels, 6 million to 15 million metric tons of nitrogen and 1 million to 2 million metric tons of phosphorus would be needed each year if the nutrients are not recycled, the report says.  These requirements represent 44 percent to 107 percent of the total nitrogen use and 20 percent to 51 percent of the total phosphorus use in the U.S.  However, recycling nutrients or utilizing wastewater from agricultural or municipal sources could reduce nutrient and energy use, the committee said. 

 

Another resource that could limit the amount of algal biofuels produced is land area and the number of suitable and available sites for algae to grow.  Appropriate topography, climate, proximity to water supplies -- whether freshwater, inland saline water, marine water, or wastewater -- and proximity to nutrient supplies would have to be matched carefully to ensure successful and sustainable fuel production and avoid costs and energy consumption for transporting those resources to cultivation facilities.  If the suitable sites for growing algae are near urban or suburban centers or coastal recreation areas, the price of those lands could be prohibitive.  A national assessment of land requirements for algae cultivation that takes into account various concerns is needed to inform the potential amount of algal biofuels that could be produced economically in the U.S.

 

One of the primary motivations for using alternative fuels for transportation is reducing greenhouse gas emissions.  However, estimates of greenhouse gas emissions over the life cycle of algal biofuel production span a wide range; some studies suggest that algal biofuel production generates less greenhouse gas emissions than petroleum-based fuels while other studies suggest the opposite.  These emissions depend on many factors in the production process, including the amount of energy needed to dewater and harvest algae and the electricity sources used. 

 

The committee emphasized that the crucial aspects to sustainable development are positioning algal growth ponds close to water and nutrient resources and recycling essential resources.  With proper management and good engineering designs, other environmental effects could be avoided, the committee said.  Examples include releasing harvest water in other bodies of water and creating algal blooms and allowing harvest water to seep into ground water.

                       

For algal biofuels to contribute a significant amount of fuels for transportation in the future, the committee said, research and development would be needed to improve algal strains, test additional strains for desired characteristics, advance the materials and methods for growing and processing algae into fuels, and reduce the energy requirements for multiple stages of production.  To aid the U.S. Department of Energy in its decision-making process regarding sustainable algal biofuel development, the committee proposed a framework that includes an assessment of sustainability throughout the supply chain, a cumulative impact analysis of resource use or environmental effects, and cost-benefit analyses. 

 

The report was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy.  The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies.  They are private and independent nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and health policy advice under an 1863 congressional charter.  Panel members, who serve pro bono as volunteers, are chosen by the Academies for each study based on their expertise and experience and must satisfy the Academies' conflict-of-interest standards.  The resulting consensus reports undergo external peer review before completion.  For more information, visit http://national-academies.org/studycommitteprocess.pdf.  A committee roster follows.

 

Contacts: 

Jennifer Walsh, Media Relations Officer

Luwam Yeibio, Media Relations Assistant

Office of News and Public Information

202-334-2138; e-mail news@nas.edu

Pre-publication copies of Sustainable Development of Algal Biofuels in the United States are available from the National Academies Press; tel. 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242 or on the Internet at http://www.nap.edu.  Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).

#       #       #

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL

Division on Earth and Life Studies

Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources

and

Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences

Board on Energy and Environmental Systems

 

Committee on Sustainable Development of Algal Biofuels

 

Jennie Hunter-Cevera (chair)

Independent Consultant

Hunter and Associates

Ellicott City, Md.

 

Sammy Boussiba

Head

Landau Family Microalgal Biotechnology Laboratory

The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research

Ben Gurion University

Beersheva, Israel

 

Joel L. Cuello

Professor

Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering

University of Arizona

Tucson

 

Clifford Duke

Director of Science Programs

Ecological Society of America

Washington, D.C.

 

Rebecca A. Efroymson

Senior Scientist

Environmental Sciences Division

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Oak Ridge, Tenn.

 

Susan S. Golden1

Distinguished Professor

Division of Biological Sciences

University of California, San Diego

La Jolla

 

Jennifer Holmgren

CEO

LanzaTech

Roselle, Ill.

 

Donald L. Johnson2

Vice President of Product and Process Technology

Grain Processing Corp. (retired)

Muscatine, Iowa.

 

Mark E. Jones

Executive External Strategy and Communications Fellow

Dow Chemical Co.

Midland, Mich.

 

Val H. Smith

Professor

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

University of Kansas

Lawrence

 

Cai Steger

Energy Policy Analyst

Natural Resources Defense Council

New York City

 

Gregory Stephanopoulos2

Willard Henry Dow Professor of Biotechnology and Chemical Engineering

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Cambridge

 

Larry P. Walker

Professor

Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering

Cornell University

Ithaca, N.Y.

 

Eric Williams

Associate Professor

Rochester Institute of Technology

Rochester, N.Y.

 

Paul V. Zimba

Professor

Center for Coastal Studies

Texas A&M University

Corpus Christi

 

RESEARCH COUNCIL STAFF

 

K. John Holmes

Study Co-director

 

Evonne P.Y. Tang

Study Co-director

____________________________________

1 Member, National Academy of Sciences

2 Member, National Academy of Engineering