National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Engineering
Institute of Medicine
National Research Council
Office of News and Public Information
National Academy of Engineering
Back | Home
News from the National Academies

Date:  March 15, 2012

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

NASA Should Phase Out Lower-Priority Aeronautics Activities, Focus on Higher Risk, Higher Payoff Projects

 

WASHINGTON — At a time when NASA's aeronautics funding is at a historic low, the agency needs to restart its highly successful flight research program, rather than devote most of its efforts to small-scale research, says a new report from the National Research Council.  To accomplish this, the agency should phase out lower-priority aeronautics activities and select two to five programs with the greatest potential.  Because flight research is a vital tool for aeronautics and has been neglected in recent years, NASA should ensure that each of these projects has a defined path to in-flight testing and that funding will be available to complete the in-flight research portion of the project in a timely manner.  The report also urges improved communication and collaboration with key stakeholders in government and industry.

 

"NASA has the ability to make substantial contributions to aeronautics in the United States for civil, commercial and military projects," explained Wesley Harris, Charles Stark Draper Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and associate provost at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, and chair of the committee that wrote the report.  "NASA has made major contributions to aeronautics in recent years, such as helping create the vibrant American unmanned aerial vehicle industry in the 1990s.  Unfortunately, there has been no flagship mission to inspire the next generation, and current small-scale research projects that don't take flight do not attract much attention." 

 

NASA's aeronautics program lacks the resources to accomplish the 51 high-priority goals it was urged to pursue in the most recent Research Council decadal survey, the report notes.  However, given current budget pressures, NASA appears to be avoiding investments in flight research due to the costs and risks.  The loss of flight research capabilities -- which are a vital tool for developing technology, proving and calibrating other research, and convincing industry, regulators, and the public that new inventions in aeronautics are effective and safe -- has hindered progress throughout NASA's aeronautics program.  Restoring flight research and accelerating progress will require strategic direction from NASA headquarters, careful leadership, and tough decisions.  It will also require NASA to cull its lower-priority aeronautics activities in order to free up funds.

 

In addition to the overwhelming amount of small-scale aeronautics projects at the agency, the report found that NASA has initiated many projects with no clear road map for how they would eventually be tested in the environment in which they would operate.  Therefore, once the agency determines its top two to five projects, each should be given a defined path to flight testing that includes details of the vehicle to be used for flight research and ensures that funding will be available for this research stage. 

 

The report examines case studies in three areas -- environmentally responsible aviation such as highly fuel-efficient aircraft, supersonics, and hypersonics -- as examples of programs where NASA already possesses the core research to make significant progress, provided the agency can allocate resources for the flight research phase.

 

To further enhance the agency's aeronautics progress in the current budget environment, the report emphasizes the need for collaboration with other governments, other U.S. agencies, and commercial companies engaged in aeronautics research.  NASA should aggressively pursue collaboration and develop a formal process for regularly soliciting input from outside groups to assure its flight research programs are relevant to national needs. 

 

The study was sponsored by NASA.  The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies.  They are private, nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and health policy advice under a congressional charter.  The Research Council is the principal operating agency of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering.  For more information, visit http://national-academies.org.  A committee roster follows.

 

Contacts: 

Lorin Hancock, Media Relations Officer

Shaquanna Shields, Media Relations Assistant

Office of News and Public Information

202-334-2138; e-mail news@nas.edu

 

 

Pre-publication copies of Recapturing NASA’s Aeronautics Flight Research Capabilities are available from the National Academies Press; tel. 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242 or on the Internet at http://www.nap.edu.  Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).

#       #       #

 

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL

Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences

Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board

 

Committee to Assess NASA’s Aeronautics Flight Research Capabilities

 

Wesley L. Harris1 (chair)

Charles Stark Draper Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and

Associate Provost

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Cambridge

 

Mark Anderson

Director

Platform Performance Technology

Boeing Research and Technology

Bellevue, Wash.


Neil A. Armstrong1

Chairman of the Board

EDO Corp. (retired)

Lebanon, Ohio

 

Edward J. Burnett

Senior Fellow

Modeling, Simulation, and Controls

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co.

Palmdale, Calif.

 

Inderjit Chopra

Director

Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center, and

Alfred Gessow Professor

Department of Aerospace Engineering

University of Maryland

College Park

 

Richard S. Christiansen

Vice President

Sierra Lobo Inc.

Milan, Ohio

Robert A. Cowart

Director

Supersonic Technology Development

Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.

Savannah, Ga.

 

John B. Hayhurst

Senior Vice President

Boeing Co. (retired)

Kirkland, Wash.

 

Timothy Lieuwen

Professor

School of Aerospace Engineering

Georgia Institute of Technology

Atlanta

 

Ronald F. Probstein1,2

Ford Professor of Engineering Emeritus

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Cambridge

 

Eli Reshotko1

Kent H. Smith Professor Emeritus of Engineering

Case Western Reserve University

Denver


Rogers E. Smith

Senior Test Pilot

NASA (retired), and

Independent Consultant

Mammoth Lakes, Calif.

 

John Tylko

Vice President of Business Development

Aurora Flight Sciences Corp.

Lincoln, Mass.

 

Randy Voland

Co-founder and Vice President

ACENT Laboratories LLC

Hampton, Va.

 

Deborah DeMania Whitis

Section Manager for Materials Applications Engineering

General Electric Aircraft Engines

Westchester, Ohio

 

 

STAFF

 

Dwayne Day

Study Director

 

________________________________________________

1         Member, National Academy of Engineering

2         Member, National Academy of Sciences