Read Full Report
Date: Aug. 9, 2007
Contacts: Christine Stencel, Media Relations Officer
Michelle Strikowsky, Media Relations Assistant
Office of News and Public Information
202-334-2138; e-mail <firstname.lastname@example.org>
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
New Approach Needed to Make Decisions About
Awarding Veterans' Benefits on a Presumptive Basis
The report recommends that Congress create a new standing advisory committee to guide the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on which health conditions and related exposures during military service merit a detailed scientific review to evaluate for presumptive disability benefits, and that Congress establish a permanent, independent science review board to assess whether the scientific evidence supports a causal connection between the exposures and the health conditions in question. Ultimately, VA's secretary would be responsible for establishing presumptions based on the evidence and guidance provided by the scientific review board.
"We envision a formalized, evidence-based, public process by which health problems in veterans and the factors that may have caused these problems can be evaluated to determine if a presumption of service connection should be made," said Jonathan Samet, professor and chair, department of epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and chair of the committee that wrote the report. "Stakeholders would have appropriate input, the process would be fully transparent, and the outcomes of the evaluation made publicly available on a timely basis," he added.
The VA automatically awards veterans monthly compensation payments and health care for disabilities that, on the basis of scientific evidence, are presumed to be caused by military service. Presumptions relieve veterans of the burden of having to prove that their health problems are connected to their service. Such presumptions have been established for nearly 150 health conditions since 1921. Examples of health conditions covered under presumptive disability include type II diabetes and prostate cancer among
In many cases, however, the evidence base for presumption decisions is weak because potential exposures are often not measured or recorded in the field and health studies may be lacking. Therefore, decisions sometimes have been made on the basis of a limited scientific foundation. The committee could not determine the basis for some of Congress' and VA's past presumptive disability decisions, which points to the need for greater transparency. The committee called on the U.S. Department of Defense to strengthen its surveillance programs for tracking troops' health and their field exposures and recommended that DOD and VA work together to improve data collection and information sharing.
The advisory committee proposed by the report should include veterans or their representatives as well as recognized experts in relevant scientific disciplines. Its role would be to receive proposals for possible health conditions and related exposures for which presumption may be warranted and recommend to the VA secretary which merit a full scientific review.
The proposed science review board should comprise experts in the key disciplines needed to weigh the full body of scientific evidence, and it should conduct a two-step process as it considers possible presumptive conditions. The first step would be to determine if a specific exposure during military service could cause a particular health condition. There will be instances in which the evidence is not sufficient to show either a clear-cut causal connection or lack thereof. The committee called for decisions to favor veterans if the available evidence shows that it is at least as likely as not that the health condition in question is causally linked to service. By favoring veterans in such instances, the committee points to the root purpose of veterans disability programs, which is to recognize and compensate for veterans sacrifices on behalf of their nation.
In the second step of the process, the science review board would estimate what portion of veterans with a specific health condition experienced the condition because of their military service. Because most health conditions can be caused by several factors -- such as occupational and environmental exposures, diet, and genetics -- the science review board should, whenever possible, estimate to what extent military service is likely to be responsible for the health condition compared with other potential causes.
This two-step process would lead to more consistent and evidence-based presumptive decisions, the report says. The committee acknowledged that there are reasons besides scientific evidence that may factor into presumption decisions, but it added that a strong scientific framework sets a solid base for the overall process. Though the advisory committee and science review board would provide guidance and expert evaluations, neither would make recommendations about granting presumptions, the report adds. The decision to grant presumptions would rest with VA, as charged by Congress.
The study was sponsored by the Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission. Established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, the
Pre-publication copies of Improving the Presumptive Disability Decision-Making Process for Veterans are available from the National Academies Press; tel. 202-334-3313 or 1-800-624-6242 or on the Internet at http://www.nap.edu. Reporters may obtain a copy from the Office of News and Public Information (contacts listed above).
# # #
[ This news release and report are available at http://national-academies.org ]
Board on Military and Veterans Health
Committee on Evaluation of the Presumptive Disability Decision-making Process for Veterans
Jonathan M. Samet, M.D., M.S. (chair)
Professor and Chair
Department of Epidemiology, and
Jacob I. and Irene B. Fabrikant Professor in Health, Risk, and Society
Margaret A. Berger, J.D.
Suzanne J. and Norman Miles Professor of Law
Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Ph.D., M.D.
Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Eric G. Bing, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
Endowed Professor of Global Health and HIV
Bernard D. Goldstein, M.D.
Professor of Environmental and Occupational Health
Guy H. McMichael III, J.D.
John R. Mulhausen, Ph.D., M.S., C.I.H.
Director of Corporate Safety and Industrial Hygiene
Richard P. Scheines, Ph.D.
Professor and Head
Department of Philosophy
Kenneth R. Still, Ph.D., M.S., M.B.A., C.I.H.
President and Scientific Director
Occupational Toxicology Associates Inc.
Duncan C. Thomas, Ph.D., M.S.
Verna Richter Chair in Cancer Research, and
Professor and Director
Department of Preventive Medicine
Sverre Vedal, M.D., M.Sc.
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences
Allen J. Wilcox, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Scott L. Zeger, Ph.D.
Frank Hurley-Catharine Dorrier Professor and Chair
Department of Biostatistics
Lauren Zeise, Ph.D., S.M.
Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Branch
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
VOLUNTEER SCIENTIFIC CONSULTANT
Melissa McDiarmid, M.D., M.P.H.
Professor of Medicine
Occupational Health Program
Catherine C. Bodurow, M.S.P.H.